Ohio ACT Launched to Fight Issue 2

Coalition plans to "debunk myth that Issue 2 is good for Ohio."

Published on: Oct 5, 2009
Ohio Against Constitutional Takeover (Ohio ACT), a new coalition representing Ohio farmers and consumers, has emerged to prevent corporate agribusiness from cementing its influence into the Ohio state constitution through the Nov. 3 ballot initiative known as Issue 2.  The coalition was created to oppose Issue 2, which would amend the Ohio Constitution to create an appointed Board with unchecked power over livestock regulation. 

Ohio ACT, a partnership that includes the Ohio Farmers Union, Ohio Ecological Food and Farming Association, Ohio Sierra Club, and Food & Water Watch, will host two town hall meetings in October in Cleveland and Columbus, to discuss why Issue 2 is destructive for Ohio farmers and consumers.

"Issue 2 will create a permanent place in the Ohio Constitution for Ohio's largest agribusiness interests," says Roger Wise, president of the Ohio Farmers Union.  "There is a way to achieve common-sense oversight without changing the Constitution and without giving the Board unchecked authority that we will likely regret further down the road."

The group notes that livestock regulation is currently enforced by the Ohio Department of Agriculture, whose formal rulemaking process allows for public input. They say electing this board into the state constitution gives it the power to override any act by the Ohio Department of Agriculture, the state legislature, and most other initiatives or referendums. Proponents of Issue 2, who are running a multi-million dollar campaign, represent corporate agribusiness, including the Ohio Farm Bureau, Ohio Cattlemen's Association, and Ohio Pork Producer's Council.

"Issue 2 will shut out Ohio consumers from future discussions about how their food is produced," says Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch. "The proponents of Issue 2 stand to gain by removing the democratic process and consumer input from how livestock regulations are made."

Ohio ACT coalition claims it is composed of grassroots organizations that represent tens of thousands of Ohioans including farmers and consumers. 

To view the complete list of coalition partners and details of Issue 2, please visit: www.ohioact.org.

Related Stories:

    Comments:
    Add Comment
    1. BryanT says:

      Thanks a lot for the informative and interesting post. I have to admit that I have not known that Ohio ACT has launched to fight issue2, despite the fact that I always follow your website. Maybe I have missed this news. Well, it was quite interesting to read about this subject and reading it I have known many new information about ACT. Thanks a lot one more time for the informative article and keep up publishing these great news in the future. Regards, Amanda Pearson from installment loans website

    2. ArabianHorse says:

      As a Farm Bureau member I worked on our local committee to find ways to fight and defeat HSUS and PETA at their own game.

      My problem with this constitutional amendment is the excessive power it places in the hands of a 13 member group of non-elected bureaucrats.

      This issue should not have been a constitutional amendment. The same objective to thwart PETA and HSUS could have been accomplished by including the key words "agricultural best management practices for such care and well-being” in section 900 of the Ohio Revised Code.

      The big question for me is, “What did it take to twist the arms of all the members of both the House and Senate to make them take such a draconian measure?” If we change the Constitution every time the wind blows from the wrong direction, what value remains in it? What next? Change the US Constitution to remove free speech and religious freedom?

      VOTE NO on ISSUE 2

    3. AmyinOh says:

      In Ohio if someone does not like how farm animals are treated they have a right to buy their own, a right to buy 'free range' eggs, a right to choose a vegan lifestyle. Obviously many don't object or the eggs would not sell in grocery stores, to restuarants, to bakeries, etc. Why do some people think they have the right to dictate the ownership and use of animals to others? HSUS thinks they have this right and I sincerely hope Issue 2 passes by a large margin to show animal rights activists and HSUS that Ohioans do believe in freedom- not just their own but others' freedom to choose and own also.
      A YES vote on issue 2 will leave Ohio issues in teh hands of OHIO people that have a stake in the animals, the economy and a fact bsed rather than emotional response. HSUS pulls for teh emotional response and warm fuzzies by those not raising food for others to further their agenda of animal rights. "Humane" = veganism if you look through their website.

    4. STARGAZER says:

      Yes, we need to stop the huge conglomerate farmers, but actually they should have been stopped thirty years ago.  Pesticides are used on crops that are dangerous for us, and genetically modified seeds are not good for us either.  And then after the PTbs have destroyed everything with their destruction of the small family farmer, then the morons start telling people to buy high-priced specialty grown vegetables and fruits.  I do not mind people having jobs, but when it comes to the manipulation of prices, and creating monopolies in agriculture or any business for that matter, then you are on your way to Marxism.

    Please provide the answer to the following question:

     =