NPPC Responded to Traceability Comment Period

Council advocates for proposed traceability system.

Published on: Dec 16, 2011

During USDA's comment period for the proposed national livestock identification program—or traceability rule-- the National Pork Producers Council submitted comments on behalf of the Swine Identification Implementation Task Force. In its comments, NPPC said - a valid traceability system would save millions of animals, reduce the financial burden on the food-animal industry and save the American taxpayer millions of dollars.

NPPC has been a strong advocate for animal traceability across all species for the sake of securing the health of the national herd. NPPC's comments illustrated the fact that the United States does not have an official pre-harvest traceability system could have significant negative ramifications on preparation, response and continuity of operations should there be a foreign animal disease outbreak in the country.

The U.S. pork industry has had an animal identification system in place since 1987. Today, approximately 95% of U.S. pork producers have registered their premises within the system. Still, NPPC fully supports a mandatory, species-specific, pre-harvest traceability system for all livestock and poultry involved in interstate commerce regardless of the rearing method or operation size.

Story Tags: livestock, usda

Comments:
Add Comment
  1. Anonymous says:

    We cattle producers are not telling the pork producers how to run their business. We already have disease programs that protect the cattle in the United States that has led to the most health cattle herd in the history of the US. It is the importation of cattle from foreign nations and the disease in wild deer, elk, and bison that USDA/APHIS should be actually doing somethig about instead of constantly harrassing the US cattle producers with a mandatory animal id system.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Why should my pleasure horses be included in a plan to help the export market? They are not raised as food animals, but they being included in ADT because the government wants to open up our borders to foreign diseases to comply with the WTO. Talk about closing the barn door AFTER the horse is loose! Government is bought and paid for by industries that don't want to deal with import/export restrictions, and the public is paying the bill.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Great. Do it for yourself and leave the rest of us out of your "games".

  4. Anonymous says:

    Pork producers have ever right to promote any government enforced program on themselves that they feel will be helpful to their business. However, when you extend your opinion over into the cattle business, you are out of line. The USA has not produced enough beef to feed the nation for 21 years and actually imported 16% of beef consumed in the last year. Exports do not help ranchers. ADT or NAIS will only add costs of production and further reduce production. However, being a competitor with beef it is easy to see that you want competitive meats to have disadvantages of new and costly government enforcements. I totally understand your interests. Today we have less disease and more government white-shirted veterinarians on salary than any time in history.

Please provide the answer to the following question:

 =