Cities and Groups Sue Over Apple Moth

Suit charges environmental analysis fundamentally flawed for CDFA program.

Published on: Apr 28, 2010
A coalition of cities and health, environmental and mothers' groups filed suit challenging the California Department of Food and Agriculture's light brown apple moth eradication program.

The suit is a culmination of nearly three years of public outcry over state-sponsored pesticide spraying for a moth experts say has been here for decades without damaging crops. Central Coast counties were sprayed from the air in 2007 in an attempt to eradicate the moth. Bay Area counties, including the highly populated urban core, were next on the list until public opposition forced a temporary halt to aerial spraying of cities. CDFA maintains it has no current plans to use further aerial spray for the moth, but plans ground spraying in communities across the state.

The coalition of groups filing suit includes: Our Children's Earth Foundation, Mothers of Marin Against the Spray, Stop the Spray East Bay, Californians for Pesticide Reform, Stop the Spray San Francisco, Pesticide Watch, Pesticide Action Network, the Center for Environmental Health, and the cities of Berkeley, Albany, and Richmond. The coalition is represented by Kathleen Goodhart and Summer Wynn of Cooley, and Deborah Reames of Earthjustice.

Courts ordered CDFA to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act before conducting additional spraying in those counties. CDFA was compelled to prepare an environmental impact report on its overall eradication program for the apple moth. That EIR was finalized last month. In the meantime, CDFA put urban spraying on hold.

The lawsuit filed in Alameda County Superior Court – on the 40th anniversary of the first Earth Day – charges that the EIR is not based on sound science, and is invalidated by a last-minute change in the objective of the program from eradicating to merely controlling the moth, a change CDFA made after the EIR was finished. As a result, the EIR does not examine a reasonable range of alternatives as required by law, including a "no-action" alternative as well as minimally toxic or non-toxic methods targeted as control and not eradication treatments, which were suggested by the public and other agencies.

CDFA currently plans treatments across the state ranging from ground spraying of pesticides and use of chemical "twist tie" diffusers to mass releases of irradiated moths and predatory wasps. In fact, the area CDFA describes as "needing treatment" includes most of the state, including the Central Valley.

CDFA says that aerial spraying will not be used against the moth "at this time." However, the EIR includes large aerial spray areas in 11 counties, and provides for possible aerial spray in any area where the population is less than 100 people per square mile. The EIR makes clear that CDFA is prepared to use warrants and law enforcement to force pesticide spraying of private property if owners refuse.

Related Stories:

    Comments:
    Add Comment
    1. RobertW says:

      FRAUD OF CDFA LBAM (MOTH) PROGRAM FINALLY UNRAVELLING. CDFA was planning on approximately $100 Million of taxpayer dollars every year for about 30 years for this fraudulent LBAM Program, and NONE FOR FARMERS. Kawamura, the Secretary of the CDFA, and the other top executives, cannot easily steal the money and put it into their own accounts. Instead, they deliver it, not to farmers, but to their buddies at large privileged insider chemical companies in the form of contracts for pesticides that are totally unnecessary. This and other similar lawsuits filed against CDFA over this matter will put mud in Kawamrua's face since he has failed to accomplish the total fraud that he has been heading up for nearly three years now. And because the Governor appointed Kawamura, tremendous embarrassment goes the governor's way, such that this fiasco for a bug that is a non-issue will offset Schwarzenegger's reputation for anything good that he did during his tenure, as little or as much as that may be. Unless the governor directs the attorney general NOT to defend this case, but rather to withdraw the flawed EIR and moth program, this LBAM fiasco will go down worse than any of the governor's "B" Movies and be more embarrassing to him. CDFA may have gotten away with such a fraudulent program. Had the economy not tanked, it is very possible that CDFA would have gotten away with the $100 million for 30 years amongst the prosperity and the public would not have not known the entire basis of the program was a fraud. Even though many of the city people complained, farmers took most of the weight of the CDFA's LBAM program. The unnecessary quarantines, inspections and forced pesticides that farmers were forced to pay for simply to make it look like LBAM was a serious pest cost the farmers dearly and still are. The farmers that actually have LBAM in their fields know that LBAM is a non-issue, but CDFA has broad reach with their propaganda, and many central valley farmers therefore believe that LBAM is still dangerous. It is unfortunate that lawsuits have to come forward, but in this case it will bring the issues to light and this unnecessary waste of our taxpayer $$$ will stop.

    Please provide the answer to the following question:

     =