There’s a lot of discussion regarding wet soils in areas of Iowa this spring, and questions about nitrogen loss and how it occurs. Iowa State University Extension agronomist John Sawyer offers the following explanation.
It may seem simple—as you search for ways to prevent nitrogen from being leached from the soil. If applied N, or N that’s mineralized organic matter nitrogen (conversion from organic N to the ammonium form) would stay in the ammonium (NH4+) form, then losses would not occur because ammonium attaches to soil and does not leach (move through the soil with water) or denitrify (microbial conversion to N gases when soils become saturated).
But that isn’t the way this works—life isn’t that simple
Unfortunately, that isn’t the way it works. Ammonium is converted to nitrate (NO3-) via nitrification. Nitrate is the form that can be moved out of the soil profile by leaching or lost by denitrification. The conversion of ammonium to nitrate and the conversion of nitrate to N gases are both microbial processes.
Hence, potential N loss is dependent upon factors that influence each. For nitrification, the soil temperature is very important (nitrification occurs faster with warm soils, slower with cold soils); For denitrification, the soil temperature and soil moisture (it only occurs when soils are saturated, which means there are anaerobic conditions) and readily available organic matter for an energy source.
If fertilizer N is applied in the nitrate form, then that N is immediately subject to these loss pathways. Mineralization does occur when soils are saturated, so ammonium can accumulate in flooded soil and add to the crop-available N.
Be sure to size-up each field’s potential for nitrogen losses
Greater losses occur when soils enter the spring season with recharged subsoil moisture, when more N is in the nitrate form, and when soils are warm. Deciding if losses are substantial enough to warrant supplemental N application, the following factors should be considered:
(1) Amount of nitrate present, which is affected by time of N application, form of N applied, rate applied and use of a nitrification inhibitor;
(2) When and the length of time soils are saturated;
(3) Subsoil recharge, leaching rate and drainage – the amount of water moved through the soil;
(4) Loss of crop yield potential from water damage.
Leaching and denitrification are not uniform across the landscape. Thus, the potential for N loss is variable and difficult to predict. For example, with high intensity rains, runoff occurs and not all of the water soaks into the soil. Instead, water in excess of infiltration moves to the lower landscape where it may form ponds or spill over stream banks into floodplains.
Does it matter when you apply your source of N?
If a N source was applied in the spring that has more rapid nitrification than anhydrous ammonia (such as urea, ammonium sulfate, ammonium in manure) or contains part of the N in the nitrate form (ammonium nitrate or UAN solutions), then conversion to nitrate would be faster. Conversely, if an ammonium-containing fertilizer (anhydrous ammonia, urea or ammonium sulfate) or manure was applied shortly before a wet period, then loss would be negligible because little nitrification to nitrate would have occurred because nitrification does not occur in saturated soils and will not resume until soils dry and become aerobic.
Conversion to nitrate does not equal loss; it just means the N is susceptible to loss. Rapid and large losses occur only with excess leaching (predominant concern with sandy/coarse-textured soils) or with saturated soils (predominant concern with heavier textured, poorly drained soils). For more on this topic see, Wet Soil Conditions and Nitrogen Loss.