American Farm Bureau Voices Concerns About the Farm Bill

Different programs for different crops could revert farm policy back 20 years.

Published on: Nov 16, 2011

The leadership of the House and Senate Agriculture Committees continue to work to reach a consensus on a farm bill recommendation to send to the Super Committee, but time is growing very short as the deadline for the committee is Nov. 23. American Farm Bureau Federation Senior Director of Congressional Relations Mary Kay Thatcher says that at the moment the farm bill is a bit of a mess.

"We have some concerns about them coming with one program that would work for corn, and a different one for cotton, and a different for rice or peanuts. You know I just don't think we have an economist in the country that could come up with equality in those programs," Thatcher said. "A good 20 years ago we got away from the government telling farmers what to plant and instead taking our signals from the marketplace, and we fear that if we go back to having all of these programs that one of them will be richer than the other and farmers will figure that out quickly and we'll be back to producing for the government, which is not a good way to go."

Should the Super Committee fail in their effort to cut $1.2 trillion, sequestration will go into effect making across the board cuts. Thatcher says if that happens the farm bill will be ugly because it will have to be done on the floor next year.

"There are a lot of environmental groups that would like to offer some pretty negative amendments," Thatcher said. "There's the nutrition community that'll want to take from agriculture and put into nutrition so this is a much better way of doing it."

Earlier this year the Super Committee made a statement that they might try to cut $3 or $4 trillion. Thatcher says she sort of chuckled at that notion.

"I don't think they can come up with the $1.2 trillion that they were mandated to do," Thatcher said. "But I do think they can come up with $700 or $800 billion that everybody agrees upon and if they come up with that and we put our $23billion contribution towards the deficit reduction and the farm bill in and we move it then I think we'll be good to go and the across the board cuts for sequestration will only have to be $400 or $500 billion instead of $1.2 trillion."

Comments:
Add Comment
  1. Anonymous says:

    It seems as though FB does not recognize certain facts.First, cotton has rolled out a plan using its anticipated share of budget baseline as a result of prior years approporations. Second cotton has been sued by Brazil on a WTO complaint resulting in an adverse opinion. The results of the WTO settlement is it must change its safety net in the new farm bill making a continuation or extension of current law at odds with the WTO ruling. Third, there will not be enough money in the next farm bill to fund the type program we currently have. Sam Spruell Alabama

  2. Anonymous says:

    Thank you, Ms. Thatcher, for saying that farmers are pretty intelligent, and that we will figure something out and be producing for the government. Fine for real farmers that they figure out how to turn a profit, but real farmers need to rotate crops for good production, so factor in that, and you will see that farmers produce intelligently, so that they can continue to produce each year, and not for the government. Your real farm bill problem is giving money to those that don't farm! I have never raised rice or peanuts but we do rotate corn and beans. It is much cheaper input wise to raise beans then it does corn, at least in my area...I have the yearly bills to substantiate this statement. So it seems that different crops should be funded differently. Again, have the money available for the real farmers who are at the mercy of weather when attempting to raise any crop; and now at the mercy of higher production costs all around!

  3. Anonymous says:

    I think if they want to cut costs, stop giving money to the farmers who don't need it. I'm talking about the ones who can pay the high rent and who have to buy new equipment so they don't have to pay taxes. I am a farmer who is in his death throws trying to hang in there. I refuse to give up but I look at all this new stuff and the price that goes along with it and I feel I have no chance. I have heard of rent as high as $570.00 an acre around Greenfield, Illinois. I say use the money where it is needed not to help the farmers who are doing quite well.

  4. Anonymous says:

    I joined this website "Get Official Samples" and i got free stuff from it, it took about a week for me to receive? something i actually wanted so just join them and it is easy and free

Please provide the answer to the following question:

 =