Ag Committee Leaders Fired Up Over Farm Bill

Last week's election brings renewed interest, support for a farm bill as Congress reconvenes this week

Published on: Nov 12, 2012

A host of Congress members have come forward voicing support for the passage of a new, five-year farm bill when Congress reconvenes for the lame duck session on Tuesday.

Several prominent members of the House and Senate Ag Committees have indicated support for the farm bill – no surprise for many of them, who have long supported the bill since it became evident that a new bill wouldn't pass before the Sept. 30 deadline.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, tied the impending budget situation to the Farm Bill.

"Americans could not be more clear that now that the election is over, they want us to work together to create jobs and reduce the deficit. If Congress can work together to pass the Farm Bill, it will create the trust and momentum we need to overcome gridlock and solve the challenges our country faces," Stabenow said in a press statement. "Passing a bipartisan Farm Bill that reduces the deficit by $23 billion is a significant first step in meeting the critical deficit reduction challenges our country must face head-on this year."

Last weeks election brings renewed interest, support for a farm bill as Congress reconvenes this week
Last week's election brings renewed interest, support for a farm bill as Congress reconvenes this week

As Stabenow mentioned, the Senate farm bill reduces spending by about $23 billion, while the House version cuts spending by $35 billion – a chunk of change that has many lumping the farm bill into the "fiscal cliff" discussion.

Ranking member of the House Agriculture Committee Collin Peterson didn't include the deficit in his comments about the farm bill, but said he was optimistic about passing the farm bill. He added that there was "no good reason not to vote on the bill" when Congress reconvenes.

"This will give us the time we need to work out our differences with the Senate and get a new five-year farm bill signed into law by the end of the year," Peterson said. He also squelched ideas of an extension: “I remain opposed to an extension of any kind for any time."

Both the House and the Senate return to session Nov. 13.

Comments:
Add Comment
  1. Anonymous says:

    Let see they have been on vacation for six weeks drawing there pay checks and more. They come back and they do nothing but talk some more. They forget we the people are pay them to get business done. If we as farms run our business that way we would be out of business. They are forgetting one thing about farmers and that is NO FARMS - NO FOOD. So either get on the stick or get in the fire but get business done. The election is over now get to work for the people and get the lobbyist out of Washington and get out of there pockets.

  2. Sustainable Farmer says:

    Passing a nearly 1 trillion dollar Farm Bill is no way to reduce the deficit and 23 billion is hardly a savings when one looks at the big picture. The Farm Bill needs to be dismantled and the food part in one bill and the farm part in another bill. Most farmers right now including us do not need any more subsidies or money for conservation. We do need crop insurance and I am willing to pay my share for it. Programs like the Conservation Stewardship Program and Wetland Reserve Program need to be eliminated. They are a big waste of time and taxpayer dollars and have little benefit anymore. Farmers that do not follow good stewardship will not stay in business long and this is a good thing as we need the best and brightest farming today with the knowledge and skills needed in today’s ag climate. Most farmers I know would like to see the government out of the way and out of the business of farming.

Please provide the answer to the following question:

 =