Advertisement
 
Share This
 

Five Nebraska Ag Groups Respond to HSUS Announcement

We Support Agriculture chairman says animal rights group partnership with Nebraska Farmers Union is 'shocking and disappointing.'
Compiled by staff 
Published: Oct 21, 2011

The newly formed partnership between the Humane Society of the United States and the Nebraska Farmers Union drew a sharp response from the five Nebraska farm groups who earlier this fall organized We Support Agriculture.

At a Lincoln press conference, NFU and HSUS announced what they call the Nebraska Agriculture Council of the Humane Society of the United States. The intent, what NFU President John Hansen called a positive approach for the state, is for the council to develop welfare standards for raising farm animals and to develop marketing opportunities for those who raise those animals. 

"We are shocked and disappointed that any Nebraska agriculture group would

DEFENDING ANIMAL AGRICULTURE: Peter McClymont is chairman of We Support Agriculture, formed this fall by five Nebraska ag groups.

DEFENDING ANIMAL AGRICULTURE: Peter McClymont is chairman of We Support Agriculture, formed this fall by five Nebraska ag groups.
align itself with an extreme animal rights organization such as the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS)," says Pete McClymont, chairman of We Support Agriculture. "Nebraska's farmers and ranchers are caring people who know how to care for their animals properly. They go to great lengths to protect their animals from disease, predators and the harsh Nebraska climate while feeding their families, their neighbors and the world."

McClymont adds, "When we announced the formation of We Support Agriculture, we explained how HSUS works and how it operated in other states. We said they hire a state director, they run a push-poll, they hold organizational meetings and threaten farm groups with ballot initiatives. We said HSUS was starting to do the same things here in Nebraska, and now we see more evidence that HSUS is targeting Nebraskans and our farmers and ranchers."

According to McClymont, John Goodwin, director of Animal Cruelty Policy at HSUS once said, "My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture."

"We know that HSUS's goal is to make Americans eat less food originating from animals such as meat, eggs and dairy products and to eliminate consumer food choices," McClymont says. "It is clear HSUS does not want to work with Nebraska's leading and respected agricultural organizations, but instead wants to bully them with the threat of a ballot initiative unless we cave in to HSUS's extreme animal rights agenda. Why in the world would we want to work with a group with that kind of extreme agenda?"

At the NFU press conference, Hansen indicated HSUS had agreed not to pursue an initiative petition in Nebraska based on the newly announced partnership. But at the same event, Joe Maxwell, HSUS director of rural development and outreach, said the animal rights group would consider using the initiative process as a last resort.

"This is why we won't sit down with extreme animal rights organizations like HSUS and PETA," McClymont says. "They don't give a straight answer to what their extreme animal rights agenda really is.

"WSA will continue our efforts to build a broad coalition of Nebraskans from across the state that stand behind Nebraska's farmers and ranchers and defend them against this extreme agenda," he adds.

We Support Agriculture consists of the Nebraska Cattlemen, Nebraska Farm Bureau, Nebraska Pork Producers Association, Nebraska Poultry Industries and the Nebraska State Dairy Association.



Permalink: Click here

Tagged: HSUS, farm, we support agriculture, humane society of the united states, Farm Bureau

Comments
Read comments from others and share your own thoughts.
Please provide the answer to the following question:

 = 
I applaud WFA and other pro Agricultural groups and their challenge of NFU and its dangerous association with the Humane Society. NFU has for years been against progressive Agriculture and therefore done harm to the consumers also. What people don't realize is that if animals are mistreated this is a big cost to individual farmers that allow this to happen. Animals have to be safe to remain healthy. If they aren't then livestock producers suffer huge losses. It is necessary to use confinement methods to raise the meat, poultry, pork, eggs, etc and deliver them to the consumer as a safe, healthy and reasonably priced commodity. The consumers will suffer if unnecessary rules are placed on producers to meet the misinformed public and NFU's support gives support to a group that shouldn't have any credibility!
Posted by Anonymous on October 26 at 7:59 AM
John Hansen should be fired for even thinking of associating with hsus. They can not be trusted!
Posted by Anonymous on October 25 at 10:14 PM
I always knew Hansen was nuts. He just likes to see his name in the headlines.
Posted by Anonymous on October 25 at 10:10 PM
*any more than something . . .
Posted by Anonymous on October 25 at 7:38 PM
HSUS can't do anything on its own, and it has not. Every restraint that has been placed on production agriculture has been placed there by a thinking public, not an extremist group. Just because HSUS brings it to the table does not make it unworthy of consideration and more than something FB brings to the table. In either event, it is the public that will say what is right and what is wrong, either at the polls, in the legislature, or at the check-out counter. And in many states they have spoken on veal crates, gestation crates and poultry cages. One can't simply reject that as uninformed. All of those practices can be legitimately concerning. Hansen sees a conversation worth having because of voters and consumers who are concerned about some practices. That's probably right. Rejecting it out of hand is risky.
Posted by Anonymous on October 25 at 7:37 PM
This is meaningless: "Hansen indicated HSUS had agreed not to pursue an initiative petition in Nebraska based on the newly announced partnership. But at the same event, Joe Maxwell, HSUS director of rural development and outreach, said the animal rights group would consider using the initiative process as a last resort." who will determine when to use the "last resort" and what is there to prevent HSUS to come back tomorrow with more demands??? Come on NFU, wake up and smell the coffee
Posted by Anonymous on October 24 at 10:39 PM
What is 'shocking and disappointing.' is how clueless these discombobulated farmers are about the demands of their consumers. Somebody has neglected to turn the pages on their calenders. Can't stick your head in the sand and not expect to get kicked in the buttinski...
Posted by Anonymous on October 24 at 10:21 PM
It is a sad day for agriculture!!!
Posted by Anonymous on October 24 at 1:31 PM
It is NE!!!
Posted by Anonymous on October 23 at 10:35 AM
NE Farmers Union needs to remove their head from their butt!!! What a group of clowns!!!!
Posted by Anonymous on October 23 at 10:34 AM
In reference to the previous post about Nebraska agriculture I beg to differ. This writer must not be aware of the tremendous strides we have taken in improving livestock handling and comfort. I do not know what the writer is referring to in fulfilling a behavior. I have a dog for companionship, a horse to carry me from here to there, cats to eat mice and cattle to supply an excellent source of protein for people to eat. I enjoy working with each animal, yet each animal has a purpose and is cared for according to the need of that animal. Has this writer been on a farm? If any cruelty exists towards animals or humans it should be stopped. It is the definition of cruelty that seems to be where there is much confusion. Animals are not human. That needs to said over and over again and animals will not evolve to be human. The WSA farm groups should be congratulated for their forward thinking in knowing the true face of HSUS.
Posted by Anonymous on October 23 at 9:34 AM
What a load of rubbish! And what a pity that Nebraska agriculture is so backward looking. As long as animals cannot fulfil the behaviour that has taken millennia to develop, they are being treated cruelly.
Posted by Anonymous on October 22 at 1:09 PM
 
Search this site:   

Read More Stories
West Holt High School Is Nebraska's Envirothon Winner
Read this storyEleven schools and 13 teams competed in contest; winner goes to National Envirothon in Pennsylvania.
Read this story

Fertilize Your Cool-Season Grasses Yet This Month
Read this storyControlling ragweed in pastures should be another goal for cattle producers.
Read this story

'Points North' No-Till Bus Tour Has Stops In Nebraska, Dakota
Read this storyNo-till on the Plains organization sponsors this yearly event for no-till enthusiasts.
Read this story

 
Miller Multimatic 200 Welder Does MIG, Stick and TIG
Fertilize Your Cool-Season Grasses Yet This Month
West Holt High School Is Nebraska's Envirothon Winner
Morning Call by Bryce Knorr
Federal Dollars Available For Rainwater Basin Wetland Projects
Senators Ask for Farm Bill Action
Senate to Get to Farm Bill Soon
Improve Irrigation Efficiency With These Two Cost-Effective Tools
FDA Issues Guidance on Antibiotic Use
Nebraska Farmers Help Heat Up Interest In Bioheat
Top 50 Tags
American Farm Bureau Federation American Soybean Association animal health biodiesel biofuels bovine spongiform encephalopathy BSE Bushel checkoff Corn Belt cotton Drought Environmental Protection Agency EPA ethanol Extension farm farm bill Farm Bureau farm progress Farm Service Agency farming fertilizer FSA grazing Harvest herbicide insurance Iowa State University Irrigation labor legal livestock producers Monsanto National Cattlemen's Beef Association National Corn Growers Association Natural Resources Conservation Service NCBA NCGA organic ranch sorghum soybean soybean association soybeans SURE tractor University of Nebraska-Lincoln usda wheat